Skewed Compass

What Perry & Cain Say about Today's GOP

Conservatives need to contemplate what the Rick Perry and Herman Cain stories say about the state of their movement and the health of their creed. Perry's debate gaffe last week was about something more important than "brain freeze." Memory lapses can strike anyone, and Perry probably helped his cause a bit by poking fun at himself at Saturday's CBS News/National Journal debate and on the David Letterman show.

What really matters is the subject that sent Perry's brain into lockdown. He was in the middle of describing sweeping changes in the federal bureaucracy closely connected to his spare vision of American government. One presumes a candidate for president ponders such proposals carefully, discusses them with advisers, and understands their implications.

Forgetting an idea at the heart of your program, in other words, is not the same as forgetting a phone number, a friend's name, a football score, or the title of a recently read book. Perry's memory lapse showed that he wasn't asserting anything that he is truly serious about because he is not serious about what government does, or ought not to do. For him, governing seems a casual undertaking.

"And I will tell you," he declared, "it's three agencies of government when I get there that are gone, Commerce, Education and the -- what's the third one there? Let's see."

Yes, let's see what "gone" might imply. Would Perry end all federal aid to education? Would he do away with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the part of the Commerce Department that, among other things, tracks hurricanes? Energy was the department he forgot. Would he scrap the department's seventeen national labs, including such world-class facilities as Los Alamos, New Mexico, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, or -- there's that primary coming up -- Aiken, South Carolina?

I'm not accusing Perry of wanting to do any of these things because I don't believe he has given them a moment of thought. And that's the problem for conservatives. Their movement has been overtaken by a quite literally mindless opposition to government. Perry, correctly, thought he had a winning sound bite, had he managed to blurt it out, because if you just say you want to scrap government departments (and three is a nice, round number), many conservatives will cheer without asking questions.

This is a long way from the conservatism I used to respect. Although I often disagreed with conservatives, I admired their prudence, their affection for tradition, and their understanding that the intricate bonds of community are established with great difficulty over time and not easy to reweave once they are torn asunder. At their best, conservatives forced us to think harder. Now, many in the ranks seem to have decided that hard and nuanced thinking is a telltale sign of liberalism.

That brings us to Herman Cain, who is trying to get out from under charges of sexual harassment. His approach is to have his campaign attack the individuals who leveled them, and, even more, to go after those who made these charges public. True, he's been inconsistent about laying blame. Off and on, he pointed to his Republican opponents. But Cain and his defenders have settled on a strategy to rally conservatives by assailing the "liberal media" and "the Democrat machine."

Politico ran the first stories about the allegations, and to argue that Politico is "liberal" requires an extraordinary leap of the imagination. Most liberals see Politico as leaning over backward to give conservatives more than their share of journalistic spin.

In any event, while women of a variety of political stripes have been in the forefront in demanding accountability from Cain, plenty of liberals have been happy to look on and let the GOP settle this one. And most members of "the Democrat machine" defended Bill Clinton against impeachment in the Monica Lewinsky matter and are aware of the meaning of the word "hypocrisy."

Not so with the many conservatives who donned full feminist armor during the Clinton scandal and now defend Cain reflexively, not even asking that he come clean about the facts.

There are honorable exceptions: Bill Bennett, for one, and to some degree, Karl Rove. But that so many other members of a movement theoretically devoted to traditional values on sexual matters would eagerly jump into this mess on Cain's side speaks volumes about its condition. To paraphrase Bennett from another context, where's the outrage about a conservatism that is losing both its intellectual moorings and its moral compass? 

(c) 2011, Washington Post Writers Group

About the Author

E. J. Dionne Jr. is a syndicated columnist, professor of government at Georgetown University, and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. His most recent book is Our Divided Political Heart: The Battle for the American Idea in an Age of Discontent (Bloomsbury Press).



Commenting Guidelines

  • All

Perry getting rid of the Energy Dept would not only orphan the 25 nuclear labs but  I bet the poor man does not know that all USA nuclear bombs are on loan to the Navy, Army and Air Force. . from the Energy dept.. put them on E-Bay maybe? I bet Perry thinks the Energy dept is all about oil.. poor man..

Ignorance and and unprincipled, intransigent, and unassailable/invincible ignorance are the culprits the Republican leadership are using in this so-called debate. It scares me that so many folk who might otherwise be reasonable, accept their rants and outright crude remarks as either  correct or even desireable. How has the national mindset fallen this low? Not even ridicule nor charges of harrassment seem to phase them. I think even Karl Rove is embarrassed. Henry Kissinger would be aghast.

"Would Perry end all federal aid to education?" Mr.Dionne, has federal aid to education improved the education of our children? By any measure it has not! Expenditure per child has doubled in recent years and the graduation rate is the same or lower,  SAT scores, even after the scoring system was eased, are the same or lower and America's students world ranking in Math and Reading are steadily declining. The Education bureaucracy in DC costs hundreds of millions, if not billions, so why not get the Federal government out of Education."His approach is to have his campaign attack the individuals who leveled them, and, even more, to go after those who made these charges public." Mr. Dionne, apparently you are suffering a 'brain freeze" regarding the vicious "Trailer trash," "drag a dollar bill" and worse attacks by Clinton supporters on the women who came forward in person and described Clinton's sexual harassment and physical assaults. These were not charges by anonymous sources lacking any description of the alleged harassment. Where was your concern back then? Perhaps you can advise Mr. Cain on how you would have handled such unsupported, unverified charges. 

E.Patrick... you call for the Feds to 'get out of education'. I assume you know that US education is financed and controlled locally with state and local taxes. Fed funds and guidelines are minimal on all levels.  Is it just ideological that you and the GOP want no Fed funding for the special needs in all states? like native American, under funded inner city city , college loans and Pell grants. Why do you not name which funds you want cut? Instead you just mention poor education results that the local school boards and administration have achieved.  We had a mayoral candidate in San Francisco base her entire campaign and all her ads on how she would fix our schools. She lost badly because  in SF we all know that the mayor has almost no say about schools.

Mr Gleason,

Living in one of the areas with the the highest property taxes in the nation to support a public school system which today costs over $25,000 per pupil from kindergarden to 12th grade  I am well aware of who pays locally. However the Education Department budget has been;

US$32 billion (2009) US$56 billion (est. 2010) US$71 billion (est. 2011) ARRA Funding: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act US$102 billion (2009) US$51 billion (est. 2010) US$23 billion (est. 2011) As of 2011, the discretionary budget is $69.9 billion

There has been litle or no improvement in inner city schools despite federal governement aid. What has federal government spending of over 320 billion dollars in three years achieved other than increasing bureauratic oversight? Is there any measurement that shows increased federal aid or higher school taxes improve the knowledge and skills of our students? The answer is .... a resounding no.


Mr Gleason,

The sentence should read "today costs over $25,000 per pupil per year from kindergarden to 12th grade"


Add new comment

You may login with your assigned e-mail address.
The password field is case sensitive.

Or log in with...

Add new comment