A blog by the magazine's editors and contributors



Benjamin Kunkel on Thomas Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century: "Paupers and Richlings"

[Piketty] wants his tax on capital to ‘promote the general interest over private interests while preserving economic openness and the forces of competition’, and has said in interviews that the indispensable role of markets in complex economies justifies the persistence of capitalism. But the familiar equation of markets with capitalism lacks a historical or theoretical basis. It ignores the extensive markets in many precapitalist societies and the strong element of monopoly and state interference with markets throughout the history of capitalism. It also overlooks the fact that few leftists since the 1980s have proposed a return to centralised command economies. Visions of a postcapitalist future, from Alec Nove’s Economics of Feasible Socialism (1983) to David Schweickart’s After Capitalism (2002), have more often been forms of market socialism.

Jonathan Chait: "Here Is the Most Shameless Anti-Obamacare Argument Yet"

The endless conservative quest to locate new and ever-more-exotic reasons to hate Obamacare has discovered virgin territory: The health-care law is crushing the economy by brutally suppressing the growth of the health-care sector. This promising new discovery is explicated in today’s Wall Street Journal editorial page, which seizes upon yesterday’s news that the health-care sector unexpectedly shrank to decry “ObamaCare's role in nearly sending the economy back into recession.”

Paul Krugman on "Sympathy for the Trustafarians"

What’s curious is that conservative economists are well aware of the danger of “regulatory capture”, in which public institutions are hijacked by vested interests, yet blithely dismiss (or refuse even to mention) the essentially equivalent problem of democratic institutions hijacked by concentrated wealth. I take regulatory capture quite seriously; but I take plutocratic capture equally seriously.

About the Author

Matthew Boudway is an associate editor of Commonweal.

1 comment

1 comment

Commenting Guidelines

  • All

The review of Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-first Century is interesting for several reasons.  Best I can tell (I've only just started the book) it's a clear, fair exposition of the book (or at least of aspects of it). and it is also an essentially Marxist critique by a youngish novelist, of  all things.  The author, youngish Benjamin Kunkel is also a founder of the new n + 1 magazine,. a sort of leftist magazine (if the term "leftist" really has any meaningleft) about all sorts of subjects. It's strong on theory of various sorts and generally very critical in method..  Is this the direction the young folks are going -- critical theorists who are even willing to reconsider the likes of Marx?  Are hey really trying to start over from scratch?

Add new comment

You may login with your assigned e-mail address.
The password field is case sensitive.

Or log in with...

Add new comment