Obama Hasn't Won Yet

How strong are his recent gains?

If the election were held right now, President Obama would likely win by about the same margin that propelled him into office in 2008. But how fragile are his current advantages?

The biggest concern for the Democrats (and the best hope for the GOP) is that the president's lead is far from overwhelming, even though Republicans -- and particularly Mitt Romney -- have been badly weakened by their nomination battle, and Obama has been left largely unmolested by the conservative super PACs.

Democrats are certainly disappointed by the apparent fading of Rick Santorum in the final week before the Michigan primary and his surprisingly disjointed performance in last week's debate. It's not as clear to me as it is to others that Santorum would be less competitive than Romney as Obama's opponent. What's plain is that Democrats have an interest in the Republican contest going on indefinitely. Romney victories in Tuesday's Michigan and Arizona primaries would likely shorten the process, and ending the nomination battle quickly is the precondition for a Republican counteroffensive. 

They need one. Up to now, the Republican battle has played entirely into Democratic hands. The Democrats need upscale voters to cast ballots on the basis of social issues and a general revulsion over the Republicans' lurch rightward. They need working-class whites to look past social issues and focus on economic inequality and the GOP's continued insistence on cutting the taxes of rich people.

That's exactly what's happening. Obama won in 2008 even though he ran 18 points behind in the white working class. Until recently, he was drifting far lower than that, and Democrats were shellacked in House races in 2010 because they lost these voters by 30 points. Obama has now recouped the share he will need among blue collars -- and in the process strengthened himself substantially in the Midwest -- by making economic fairness a central theme of his re-election campaign. He's been helped by a rise in public confidence that the economy is finally recovering.

In the meantime, Romney's wealth and tax status, his private equity background, and his utter tone-deafness on matters related to class have all hurt him in the blue-collar world. 

At the same time, social moderates -- particularly women -- have been appalled by the direction of the Republicans on issues such as contraception, and also by the sharp turn to the social-issue right by many Republican-controlled state governments. Virginia put itself at the center of this when its legislature came close to passing a law that would have subjected women to a highly intrusive ultrasound before they could receive an abortion. National outrage led Bob McDonnell, Virginia's Republican governor who would very much like to be his party's vice-presidential candidate, to scale back the bill's requirements.

But the GOP's self-correction in Virginia is also a warning for Democrats. Republicans, now aware that they are on a losing track, may begin to engineer a series of course changes. The fact that House Republicans reached agreement with the president to continue the payroll tax holiday is the clearest sign that the party realizes how a far more assertive Obama is dangerous to them in a way that the conciliatory Obama of last year's debt-ceiling battle was not.

Moreover, while Obama's lead in some polls is significant -- in Friday's Real Clear Politics poll averages he led Romney by five points and Santorum by six -- his job-approval ratings are still in the middling range. A recent Pew survey, for example, pegged his approval at 45 percent among independents, a big increase over his 37 percent rating last month, but far from commanding. Any reversal of the economic recovery could endanger even this level of support.

All of which explains why Romney desperately has to win Michigan this Tuesday and effectively shut down the nomination fight by the end of the Super Tuesday primaries on March 6. A Romney no longer driven by the need to pander to the right could regroup and reposition himself. He could spend some quiet time with his consultants who need to give him intensive retraining on how to talk to (and about) average Americans. And the super PACs, fueled by millionaires eager to avoid the tax rates Obama is promising, could fire away freely, field-testing messages and searching for the president's points of weakness.

Obama is far better off than he was six months ago. But he cannot afford to go wobbly or to let the good news go to his head. 

(c) 2012, Washington Post Writers Group

Topics: 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

I wonder how a man who is clearly anti-Catholic will do?

@John J Plick (2/27, 11:47 am)  I'm sorry, who do you mean? 

On the Republican side, Gingrich and Santorum are Catholics.  Romney is Mormon but people in Massachusetts have no complaints (that I'm aware of) that he's anti-Catholic.  Ron Paul is unlikely to get the nomination, and has a history of profiting from racist and anti-Semitic sentiments (I'm not saying he holds those sentiments himself), but not anti-Catholic sentiments (again, that I'm aware of).

On the Democratic side, President Obama is a Protestant Christian but has a long track record of working with Catholics (among others) and of taking the time to understand and appreciate many of the Church's teachings----particularly those in the social realm.

I would imagine, Mr Hill, that you do not consider “yourself” anti-Catholic. As for the President, who is in fact the subject of the article (the nominees have not had a chance to “prove” themselves, one way or the other) I would say, what do you consider deceiving the American bishops regarding a promised exemption from abortion services earlier in the term (a memorandum was exposed, I believe) and the latest, the so-called HHS Mandate, imposing “Reproductive Services” on Catholic hospitals, with the very latest, a “word-game” “accommodation,” that seems to suggest that the Bishops could consider themselves “removed” from direct responsibility, when in fact in any event, the Catholic institution will be subsidizing the service one way or another, is? I work in psychiatric medicine, and am quite aware of the fact that any individual tends to “see what they want to see...” Catholic doctrine, however, holds that truth is absolute, and immutable. For instance, anyone might believe that there is “no judgment” and “no Hell...,” but our Doctrine clearly states that that does not eliminate the reality of such, and that culpability is not removed. What the president appears, or would like to appear, to be, and what he actually is...; that, I am afraid, are two completely different things.

John:  once again you resort to ad hominem comments when speaking of the President.  Your canard that he is "anti-Catholic" is uncalled for.  You should be ashamed!

Then allow me to become even MORE “shameful” in your eyes. This election is NOT the center of the issue to be sure. Whether he (President Obama) wins or loses makes little difference to me. What DOES make a difference to me is the integrity of the Church, which the bishops themselves have allowed to deteriorate into ruins. President Obama I surely hold less guilty, for he claims to be a protestant (if that is what he truly is) but surely a politician who is shrewdly exploiting the divisions that the bishops have allowed, which are tearing our Church apart. It is you so-called "liberal Catholics" that I question. Do you think I am just going to "blow away" like chaff because you say I should be ashamed? Who are you that you think you can do that? It is written, “Do not use your freedom as a cloak for vice." That is what you have done and that is what you continue to do. You will not be able to use the American government as a shield indefinitely. If God has to, He will surely remove it.

It is impossible to bury anything that is of God. The Feast of the Resurrection should have taught you that much. For now God has chosen not to judge you through the Authority if the Church, but in His mercy he has taught me patience. There is still a bit of mercy still available to you. I suggest you take advantage of it.

Share

About the Author

E. J. Dionne Jr. is a syndicated columnist, professor of government at Georgetown University, and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. His most recent book is Our Divided Political Heart: The Battle for the American Idea in an Age of Discontent (Bloomsbury Press).