An unholy land

The war Israel is fighting against terrorism is not the same war the United States is fighting. The origins, responsibilities, and resolutions of the two are distinct and U.S. identification with Israel’s war seems only to bring greater conflict to the Middle East.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s December 2 visit with President George W. Bush, with its photo-op handshake, signaled U.S. assent to Israel’s current policies. If we are to be an honest broker, we must maintain a greater distance from Sharon. Sharon was unexpectedly headed back to Israel because of three suicide bombings in which twenty-five were killed and many injured. The continuing Hamas suicide bombings are horrible, and in that sense, yes, terrorism is terrorism whether it occurs in New York or Jerusalem. But what about Israeli incursions into and shelling of Palestinian areas? What shall we call them?

Though Arafat is responsible for the current intifada, Sharon shares with him responsibility for the downward spiral of violence. Arafat was foolish to let the settlement offered in summer 2000 pass without negotiations. The subsequent election of Sharon has pitted two hard-liners against one another, both engaged in politique du pire. There are people in Israel and in the Sharon administration as ready to drive the Palestinians from the West Bank as there are Palestinians wanting to drive Israel from the Middle East. Continuing Israeli...

To read the rest of this article please login or become a subscriber.