Obama Needs His Friends Back

Looking for the Supporters He's Lost

President Obama is furiously fending off those “winter of discontent” stories, and it’s not even winter yet.

The news about the health care law that is supposed to be his greatest achievement is almost uniformly downbeat. The public is unhappy with national politicians of all kinds. And then there are the polls, a currency that the political world -- despite ritualistic denials -- values more than any other.

On Tuesday, the Quinnipiac poll showed Obama with the lowest approval rating of his presidency. Only 39 percent approved his performance; 54 percent disapproved. The Quinnipiac numbers echoed those of a recent Pew survey that pegged the president’s job approval at 41 percent, with 53 percent disapproving.

In situations of this sort, there is always a search for an instant repair. “Fix the website” is the most obvious, and it’s certainly necessary. But a tech problem has now been compounded by the reality of health care reform itself. The small but highly visible individual insurance market was volatile before there ever was Obamacare. But it’s hardly surprising that some of those who are in it are angry when plans are canceled and premiums rise.

The very purpose of insurance reform is to create a broad market in which the less healthy will be able to get coverage at affordable prices. This made a certain amount of cost shifting inevitable, a truth captured succinctly by The New Republic’s Jonathan Cohn, one of the nation’s premier health policy writers: “You can’t fix health insurance without changing health insurance.”

But the president’s promise that Americans would be able to keep their policies downplayed this risk, and it now haunts him. A Republican opposition that never wanted Obamacare to work -- “an organized constituency for failure,” in former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers’ phrase -- jumped on Obama’s words even as GOP politicians disrupted the law at the state level.

What this means is that there will be no quick fix. Obama faces a longer slog, and he has to ask where he can begin his political recovery.

A detailed comparison of two Pew surveys -- one conducted in December 2012 that found Obama with a 55 percent-39 percent approval rating and the more recent survey with the 12-point approval deficit -- shows that while he has lost support across the board, he has taken a big hit among two classic swing groups, white Catholics and political independents.

Conservative independents who didn’t much like him before like him even less now. But most striking are the president’s severe losses with two groups of independents: those who call themselves liberal and those who lean toward the Democrats. In principle, both should be open to reconciliation with the president. Many in their ranks may be turned off not only by the health care plan’s failures but also by the controversy over NSA surveillance and possibly the battle earlier this year over intervention in Syria.

His drop with Hispanics was close to the national average, but significant: Obama’s approval fell from 75 percent after the election to 60 percent now. Frustration over the slow economy and the stalling of immigration reform are likely playing a role.

And Obama’s losses were also steep among white blue-collar women -- those without college degrees. As with Hispanics, they have reason to be dissatisfied with the economy and a sense that Washington has defaulted in dealing with basic working-class and middle-class economic challenges.

The president’s one advantage is that congressional Republicans seem to be in even worse shape than he is. Democrats outnumbered Republicans in the Pew survey by 32 percent to 24 percent. And a Gallup poll released Tuesday showed Congress with an approval rating of 9 percent, the lowest in the 39 years Gallup has asked the question.

For Obama, there is no escaping health care. He needs to engage in an aggressive new defense that acknowledges problems in the individual market. He should be open to transitional patches, but only if they do not undercut the overall reform effort. And he must take on Republicans over how high the cost of dismantling Obamacare would be to the large swath of Americans who will benefit from it -- or already do.

But he also has to grapple with the wider causes of discontent, from the surveillance program to gridlock on immigration reform to the strained economic circumstances of many who have supported him in the past. He can survive his enemies. He needs to win back the citizens who were once his friends.

(c) 2013, Washington Post Writers Group

Topics: 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

The GOP and Fox news is betting the future of the Republican party that the Federal Government CANNOT fix the website and the ACA. Let's not tell them that the Federal gov, beat Japan, Germany, the Soviets and put men on the moon.... and the GOPers are still betting that the Federal gov cannot fix a website with ALL the money and resources in the world at there disposal with 'none to call them to account'. Can anyone get me in a poker game with these GOP idiots? O... and the market is at RECORD high so I have a big stake. ,,,

The DMV and my local municipality which can't seem to manage to fix the potholes on my street agree that the Federal government should have no problem fixing the ACA. After all, the ACA is so simple, transparent, and straight forward.

Ryan... so it's state and local government that stinks too ?... get up some courage of convictions and become an anarchist..

Salon magazine investigated some of the poster children that Fox News showed as losers in Obamacare.  To a one, they were either outright frauds or were just misinformed. 

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/health/health-care/sean-hannitys-obamacar...
There are some people who will pay higher prices for the same coverage, but it's not going to the the four or five times their current premium prices that make for entertainment.  Fox is an entertainment venue disquised as a news venue. 

I have no idea why anyone should be allowed to continue to sell junk insurance policies for another year, or why anyone would deliberately buy one, outside of stupidity on the buyer's part and political pull through campaign contributions on the seller's part.

To me, the discussion has looked like this:
"Boo Hoo!  My snake oil was taken off the market!"
"OK.  You can buy your snake oil for another year."

Share

About the Author

E. J. Dionne Jr. is a syndicated columnist, professor of government at Georgetown University, and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. His most recent book is Our Divided Political Heart: The Battle for the American Idea in an Age of Discontent (Bloomsbury Press).