Last month, Wikileaks publishedthe 2003 edition of the manual. Among other controversial provisions,the manual instructed officials to hide certain detainees from theInternational Committee of the Red Cross, a practice that the militaryrepeatedly denied was in existence at Guantanamo. Spokespeople for theU.S. military's Southern Command, which oversees Guantanamo Bay, saidthe manual was outdated and assured that some instructions thatviolated the Geneva Conventions were no longer in effect.
Ackerman quotes the Wikileaks exegetes, who find that
Systematic denial of Red Cross access to prisoners remains. The use ofdogs remains. Segregation and isolation are still used routinely andsystematically including an initial period of at least 4 weeks "toenhance and exploit the disorientation and disorganization felt by anewly arrived detainee", only terminated at the behest ofinterrogators. Both manuals assert that detainees will be treated inaccordance with the "spirit" of the Geneva conventions "to the degreeconsistent with military needs", but never assert that the conventionsare actually being followed at Guantanamo. Put into practice, neithermanual complies with the Geneva conventions.
How long until the leakers are accused of giving aid to the enemy? Place your bets.