Short Take

Do No Harm

Should we medicate to execute?

Kursten Hensl | Richard E. Redding

In 1986, the United States Supreme Court decided Ford v. Wainwright, holding that the execution of the mentally incompetent violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. A prisoner cannot be executed unless sufficiently competent to understand the nature and reasons for his punishment. This year, in a six-to-five decision and the first ruling (...)


 

The remainder of this article is only available to paid subscribers. If you’re not currently a Commonweal subscriber in print or online, an online-only subscription costs just $34 a year. Click here for immediate access

 

[register as a new user] [forgot your password?]

about the writer

Kursten Hensl is a student in the program.

about the writer

Richard E. Redding is associate professor of law at Villanova University, associate professor of psychology at Drexel University, and director of the J.D./Ph.D. Program in Law and Psychology at Villanova and Drexel Universities.

Free e-newsletter

More Information