Bill Cork on John Allen on Pope Benedict’s upcoming beatification of Fr. Gabino Olaso Zabala. First Allen:
According to written testimony from the victim, Olaso
participated in the 1896 torture of a Filipino priest named Fr. Mariano
Dacanay, who was suspected of sympathy for anti-Spanish
revolutionaries. Dacanay’s own account asserts that Olaso and a handful
of other Augustinians encouraged guards who were administering the
torture, and that at one point Olaso himself kicked Dacanay in the
head, hard enough to leave the suffering priest semi-conscious.Historians generally regard Dacanay’s testimony as credible.
Augustinian Fr. Fernando Rojo, the Rome-based postulator for the cause
of Olaso and the other Augustinian martyrs, told NCR Oct. 10 that he does not see “any reason to doubt the basic historical accuracy of the facts” contained in Dacanay’s account.
Then Cork:
Allen offers the excuse, “To be sure, Olaso’s conduct must be
understood in the context of his times, since the late 1890s were a
violent era in the Philippines.”
But he was a priest, a representative of the Prince of Peace, whose
teachings of non-violence have been spread for 2000 years. That’s the
true historical context.
And what of the historical context for this beatification–the world today?
Then Allen:
Nonetheless, the revelation that someone set for beatification by Pope
Benedict XVI was a willing participant in torture may be disconcerting
- in the first place for Filipinos, who see the 1896 rebellion as a key
moment in the birth of their nation; and more broadly for those
concerned with contemporary moral and legal debates over torture,
especially in the context of the “war on terrorism.” Despite clear
official Catholic teaching against torture, some may wonder if the
church is sending a mixed message by beatifying someone who apparently
administered torture himself.
Me: “Disconcerting”? You don’t say. How about “appalling”? Too strong? After all, torture was all the rage in late-nineteenth-century Philippines. And, let’s not forget, Olaso isn’t the first beatified guy with a “checkered past.” As Allen points out, St. Mark Ji Tianxiang was canonized in 2000 even though he was a known opium addict. And Fr. Jean-Marie Gallot was beatified in 1955 despite the discovery that he had been a Mason. See, not all saints led spotless lives.