The Christian Updike

Posted by Matthew Boudway

In an earlier thread on the death of John Updike, Joseph S. O’Leary directs our attention to “Seven Stanzas at Easter,” a poem written very early in Updike’s career. The poem is unambivalently Christian, and one wonders whether Updike could — or would — have written it later in his career. Ambivalence about all things, but perhaps especially about religion, was one of Updike’s literary hallmarks. Nobody was better at evoking the texture of a complicated mood; and, like Whitman, he was not afraid of self-contradiction. Many of his later stories about faith and the loss of faith could be read as fictive commentaries on Mark 9:24 — “Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief.” But this early poem reads more like a poetic commentary on Flannery O’Connor’s famous line about the Eucharist: “If it’s just a symbol, then to hell with it.”

SEVEN STANZAS AT EASTER

Make no mistake: if He rose at all
it was as His body;
if the cells’ dissolution did not reverse, the molecules
reknit, the amino acids rekindle,
the Church will fall.

It was not as the flowers,
each soft Spring recurrent;
it was not as His Spirit in the mouths and fuddled
eyes of the eleven apostles;
it was as His flesh: ours.

The same hinged thumbs and toes,
the same valved heart
that-pierced-died, withered, paused, and then
regathered out of enduring Might
new strength to enclose.

Let us not mock God with metaphor,
analogy, sidestepping, transcendence;
making of the event a parable, a sign painted in the
faded credulity of earlier ages:
let us walk through the door.

The stone is rolled back, not papier-mâché,
not a stone in a story,
but the vast rock of materiality that in the slow
grinding of time will eclipse for each of us
the wide light of day.

And if we will have an angel at the tomb,
make it a real angel,
weighty with Max Planck’s quanta, vivid with hair,
opaque in the dawn light, robed in real linen
spun on a definite loom.

Let us not seek to make it less monstrous,
for our own convenience, our own sense of beauty,
lest, awakened in one unthinkable hour, we are
embarrassed by the miracle,
and crushed by remonstrance.

Send to a Friend

X
E-mail this Printer friendly

Comments

  1. Mr. Boudwa -

    Thanks very much for posting the poem. Really fine, and quite relevant, I think, for many contemporary Catholics. I’m with him and Flannery O’Connor all the way.

    Which collection of his later short stories would you recommend?Also, might you recommend a Barth-for dummmies book? I mean one by him that might be accessible to non-theologians like me. There are no books by him on our local Bar nes and Noble shelves, so I don’t know what to choose from Amazon.

  2. I have a long note, which I’m going to post as a separate thread because I can’t get it to set up right in this box.

  3. I didn’t know it was an early poem — in fact I was surprised when I came across it last year, thinking that it might be a recantation of the liberal reading of the resurrection narratives put forward in “Roger’s Version” or possibly even an ironic poem.

    Updike could have been a great Christian novelist like Dostoevsky, who as Rowan Williams shows in his book on Dost. could allow his characters to live and breathe in all postures of sinfulness and saintliness, confident that the love of Christ will prevail in the end.

    But to say this is perhaps as inapposite as to say that Mozart could have written great Christian operas.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment

Free e-newsletter

More Information