Comments

1. Scott Dodge 06/03/2008 - 9:14 pm

   I think Mr. Perkins makes a great deal of sense. Besides, Paul argued against circumcision for Gentile converts.

2. Cathleen Kaveny 06/04/2008 - 6:27 am  contributor

   Yes, he could use a course on NT with Luke Timothy Johnson.

   What’s interesting to me is the effort of Mr. Perkins to repackage his agenda in a broader context–the FRC has always seemed to me the epitome of focus on its own issues.

   Everyone’s doing “consistent ethic” these days, it seems.

3. Scott Dodge 06/04/2008 - 1:29 pm

   I suppose “consistent ethic” beats “inconsistent ethic baddda-boom

   Anyway, like you, I usually find Colbert brilliant. In this interview, he seems to avoid issue a bit. If nothing else, Tony Perkins was a good sport.

4. Cathleen Kaveny 06/04/2008 - 3:54 pm  contributor

   Yes, he was. I wonder how he feels about it–it wasn’t on the FRC website, the last time I checked!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment