Sargent Shriver, R.I.P.
From the New York Times obituary:
R. Sargent Shriver, the Kennedy in-law who became the founding director of the Peace Corps, the architect of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s war on poverty, the United States ambassador to France and the Democratic candidate for vice president in 1972, died on Tuesday. He was 95.
Briefly, here’s an excerpt about Shriver from Rodger Van Allen’s The Commonweal and American Catholicism:
R. Sargent Shriver was the son of parents who were among Michael Williams’s group of Calvert Associates [who founded Commonweal]. Shriver’s father was a convert to Catholicism who became an avid reader in the faith, and hosted prominent European Catholics like Hilaire Belloc and Pail Claudel. On his mother’s side, he was a descendant of a three-hundred-year-old Maryland Catholic family that had come over with the first Lord Baltimore to settle Maryland. His godfather was James Cardinal Gibbons, a close friend of his maternal grandfather.
Click here to read David O’Brien’s review of Sarge: The Life and Times of Sargent Shriver.
Requiescet in pace.



Yes, Shriver was an exemplary man.
I learned a lot in that review. Eunice and Sarge were really in Opus Dei? That is a surprise. Opus Dei can’t be so bad, can it?
I wonder why Sarge opposed an amendment banning abortion.
O’Brien makes good points about the bishop/catholic politician problems we have today. On the other hand, where are the Sarge/Califano politicians today? There is Bob Casey, but there are just so many disappointing Catholic politicians that it is hard to blame the bishops for being pissed. Does the church have the culture to produce a Sarge anymore?
Hard to beat this picture as a tribute — his granddaughter Carolina Shriver stroking his face at the wake for Eunice:
http://content.usatoday.com/_common/_scripts/big_picture.aspx?width=490&height=336&storyURL=&imageURL=/news/_photos/2009/08/13/shriverx-large.jpg
Scott Stossel, his biographer, has a lovely reminiscence over at The Atlantic where he is an editor:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/the-good-works-of-sargent-shriver/69677/
It concludes:
David, thank you for the link to the Stossel piece. Inspiring the faithful is a wonderful thing. How much more wonderful to be able to inspire the cynical, doubting curmudgeons.
Though Sargent Shriver was Peace Corps director before my time, he has legendary status within the agency, and as one of the more than 200,000 current and returned Peace Corps volunteers, I honor his efforts to transform what was initially mocked by some as a wasted effort into what IMO has been the best dollar-for-dollar foreign assistance expenditure the U.S. has ever made. The Peace Corps celebrates its 50th anniversary later this year. I’m sure there will be many tributes to Shriver as part of the festivities.
Shriver, along with his wife, Eunice, will also hopefully be remembered for their pro-life efforts, from their work on behalf of the mentally and physically disabled to their advocacy on behalf of the unborn. In 1992 they were signatories to a full-page ad in the NYT titled “A New American Compact: Caring about Women, Caring for the Unborn.” The document is one of the most powerful statements I’ve seen about what is perhaps the most divisive issue in America.
http://i739.photobucket.com/albums/xx40/mmatters/NYT07141992ProlifeLetter.jpg
From Colman McCarthy’s column in the WaP, about Shriver hiring him in the 1960s:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/18/AR2011011804789.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
“…and their personal pain comes through when they realize there was never enough money.”
We now have an important moral challenge in Haiti where the money is available, yet the situation has remained the same. In honor of Sargent and Eunice Shriver, I would love to see a joint effort between The Peace Corp and Catholic Relief Services, reflective of respect for the Dignity of the human person grounded in an authentic Love that when giving fish, teaches one how to fish, simultaneously. This would include a physical presence in Haiti with protection from some members of our Armed forces.
May Sargent and Eunice Shriver rest in The Peace of Christ.
I look forward to reading all the links here.
Just a quick comment: Sargent Shriver’s public life was pretty much before my time: I was a young child when he was a VP candidate, and I don’t recall him being much in the public eye afterward, except very occasionally as a member of the Kennedy clan. My comment is that his Catholicism, to which he seems to be an outstanding witness, was not, I think, well-known to the general public – I didn’t know about it until seeing this post. For those who were more mature than I was during his presidential campaign: was his Catholicism well-known, and was it an issue or topic of conversation back then? I was living in a thick Catholic family/parish network in those days, and attending a Catholic school, but I just don’t remember anyone talking about it or mentioning it. In that milieu in those days, ‘vote for the Catholic candidate’ would not have been far-fetched :-). Was it something that he wouldn’t have wanted to capitalize on, politically?
Thanks to Bill C. for his personal tribute.
If someone wonders about the decline in Catholic politicians today, the tangle of Church politics into the areana has made a difference.
The Catholicism of Sargent Shriver’s was different and, from my perspective, much more inspirational and communiatarian than the one we often hear today.
“Though Sargent Shriver was Peace Corps director before my time, he has legendary status within the agency..”
Yes! Before me, too, but definitely one of my heroes.
Dear JC and all,
RE: Catholic politicians & bishops. Bart Stupak — a true hero — was hung out to dry by the bishops. That, plus a potentially bruising campaign for re-election made him decide to retire. Thankfully, Sarge didn’t face that sort of nonsense. He could have had a life of ease, but turned instead to true public service. Thank the Lord. And may the bishops reconsider their current stance on such things.
mjc
NPR had a piece this morning about Shriver. I didn’t catch the name of the Shriver friend being interviewed, but he spoke in part about Shriver’s Catholicism, including how Shriver tried to attend Mass every day. The interviewee said that he once asked Shriver why he went to Mass so frequently, and Shriver replied that he needed Christ daily.
Another legacy that Eunice and Sargent left behind is that they were able to keep their children, for the most part, out of the media glare that was a negative for so many of the Kennedy cousins. True, Maria Shriver married an Austrian bodybuilder who became a movie star and the governor of California (one can’t make this stuff up ;)), but she has also been a strong advocate for Alzheimer’s victims. I heard her on TV a couple of years ago talking about how her father no longer recognized her. She would have to re-introduce herself as his daughter each time she met him. Heartbreaking. And the Shriver sons also absorbed their parents’ example for getting involved in causes focused on helping others. One now runs Special Olympics, another is an executive with Save the Children, a third started his own charity, and yet another is an activist lawyer. The Shriver parents must have something right with their kids.
As I noted at the time, Tim Shriver spoke very movingly at our anniversary gala in 2009 about the strong faith that his parents shared, and how it remained meaningful to his father even as he lost most of his connections to the outside world. I thought of that when I heard the news this morning.
The Peace Corps sent this out over Facebook, a promotional video from the 60s with Sargent Shriver. (The first couple of minutes is with Shriver, the last half shows Peace Corps training at the time, which is a hoot for anyone that ever served. ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1t_V1C3fkoI
“I didn’t know about it until seeing this post. For those who were more mature than I was during his presidential campaign: was his Catholicism well-known, and was it an issue or topic of conversation back then? ”
The first election I voted in was the Nixon/Agnew-McGovern/Shriver election in 1972.
Vietnam obliterated most other discussion, as I recall. Shriver’s religion was never an issue among young Democrats, anyway. As a Kennedy in-law, I think it was generally expected that he would take JFK’s position on religion–it’s a private matter–and that’s pretty much how he campaigned.
Interestingly, both McGovern, son of a Methodist minister, and Shriver were pro-life. McGovern wrote in “The Nation”:
“Liberals such as I are accused not only of being weak on defense but also weak on marriage and the family, the work ethic and reverence for religious faith. I have never known a political leader in either party who was disloyal to America, or who scoffed at marriage and the family, or who disrespected God and religious faith. Republicans and Democrats alike are pro-American, pro-freedom, pro-life, pro-family and pro-God Almighty.”
Here are two excepts from Bono’s N.Y. Times op ed piece about Shriver:
Probably a prejudice on my part, but who knew Bono could write so well?
Mysterious Ways.
A nice op ed.
Given the unanimity of the praise for “Sarge”, it seems that he must have been something of a saint.
From a Garry Wills piece on Shriver, on the blog of the New York Review of Books: