<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too bad to be true</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:48:52 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mollie Wilson O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54144</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollie Wilson O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54144</guid>
		<description>Stuart, Sean, here&#039;s the thing. The predictable diversionary tactics of &quot;your side does it too!&quot; are particularly out of step here. And Stuart, I find myself noting once again that you can&#039;t play the &quot;consider the source&quot; card when the source is calling out the lies and distortions of someone else -- and happens to be absolutely right. Got a problem with Media Matters regarding matters unrelated to this post? Send them a letter. Surely that&#039;s a better way to spend your very valuable time than leaving 5 or 6 comments on a post that you&#039;re not even sure you can trust. 

Sean, I&#039;m not sure any of your arguments are worth making, but you ought to pick one.

Drew - thanks for the info. &quot;The idea is silly at best&quot; -- yes, and precisely the point of my post. No one should have fallen for this, especially not those who are inclined to take religion seriously. And anyone who feels the need to qualify that is digging the hole deeper. I&#039;m going to close this thread now before anyone else gets out their shovel. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart, Sean, here&#8217;s the thing. The predictable diversionary tactics of &#8220;your side does it too!&#8221; are particularly out of step here. And Stuart, I find myself noting once again that you can&#8217;t play the &#8220;consider the source&#8221; card when the source is calling out the lies and distortions of someone else &#8212; and happens to be absolutely right. Got a problem with Media Matters regarding matters unrelated to this post? Send them a letter. Surely that&#8217;s a better way to spend your very valuable time than leaving 5 or 6 comments on a post that you&#8217;re not even sure you can trust. </p>
<p>Sean, I&#8217;m not sure any of your arguments are worth making, but you ought to pick one.</p>
<p>Drew &#8211; thanks for the info. &#8220;The idea is silly at best&#8221; &#8212; yes, and precisely the point of my post. No one should have fallen for this, especially not those who are inclined to take religion seriously. And anyone who feels the need to qualify that is digging the hole deeper. I&#8217;m going to close this thread now before anyone else gets out their shovel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Hannaway</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54141</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Hannaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54141</guid>
		<description>Mark

First, I was responding to David&#039;s fatuous assertion that there were &quot;no left wing crazies,&quot; not the veracity or lack thereof of the Brietbart post.  Second, I think it is worth pointing out that the problem Mollie is complaining about, it seems to me, is not purely ideological but is part and parcel of the kind of media involved.  As bad as Brietbart can be, sites like the Huffington Post, the Daily Kos etc. are at least as bad or worse.  These sites take what fits their narative and run with it - right or left

On the &quot;personality worship&quot; comment - no, not hyperbole.  It is more than just &quot;liking&quot; the guy.  People &quot;liked&quot; George Bush and Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan when they were elected.  This is different, at least for a significant portion of the population  If those videos of children singing his praises to the tune of Jesus Loves the Little Children&quot; didn&#039;t creep you out then I guess we will not agree on that.

I had something of a revelation yesterday when reading about the issue of Obama&#039;s Safe School Czar.  I was reading stories on both sides of the issue.  The guy has admitted that when told by a 15 year old boy that he was having sex with an older man who had picked him up at a bus station he not only didn&#039;t report it as required by law, he gave him advice on how to manage the relationship and avoid disease.  His defenders in print basically ignored this and attacked his attackers.  At first I thought - well, it&#039;s a tactic.  Then it occurred to me that they didn&#039;t try and defend what he did because they didn&#039;t think it was wrong.  I read the man&#039;s own words and I thought if he were my kid&#039;s teacher I would have wanted him strung up - apparently an irrational response according to his defenders.

The point of this is simply, we are looking at the same things and seeing something completely different.  I see school children chanting, and Che-like posters of the president plasterd all over my hometown, you-tube music videos portraying his as a Messiah-like character, and I see &quot;personality worship.&quot; To you - they just like the guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark</p>
<p>First, I was responding to David&#8217;s fatuous assertion that there were &#8220;no left wing crazies,&#8221; not the veracity or lack thereof of the Brietbart post.  Second, I think it is worth pointing out that the problem Mollie is complaining about, it seems to me, is not purely ideological but is part and parcel of the kind of media involved.  As bad as Brietbart can be, sites like the Huffington Post, the Daily Kos etc. are at least as bad or worse.  These sites take what fits their narative and run with it &#8211; right or left</p>
<p>On the &#8220;personality worship&#8221; comment &#8211; no, not hyperbole.  It is more than just &#8220;liking&#8221; the guy.  People &#8220;liked&#8221; George Bush and Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan when they were elected.  This is different, at least for a significant portion of the population  If those videos of children singing his praises to the tune of Jesus Loves the Little Children&#8221; didn&#8217;t creep you out then I guess we will not agree on that.</p>
<p>I had something of a revelation yesterday when reading about the issue of Obama&#8217;s Safe School Czar.  I was reading stories on both sides of the issue.  The guy has admitted that when told by a 15 year old boy that he was having sex with an older man who had picked him up at a bus station he not only didn&#8217;t report it as required by law, he gave him advice on how to manage the relationship and avoid disease.  His defenders in print basically ignored this and attacked his attackers.  At first I thought &#8211; well, it&#8217;s a tactic.  Then it occurred to me that they didn&#8217;t try and defend what he did because they didn&#8217;t think it was wrong.  I read the man&#8217;s own words and I thought if he were my kid&#8217;s teacher I would have wanted him strung up &#8211; apparently an irrational response according to his defenders.</p>
<p>The point of this is simply, we are looking at the same things and seeing something completely different.  I see school children chanting, and Che-like posters of the president plasterd all over my hometown, you-tube music videos portraying his as a Messiah-like character, and I see &#8220;personality worship.&#8221; To you &#8211; they just like the guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAT</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54140</link>
		<dc:creator>MAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54140</guid>
		<description>&quot;The more you try to defend this stuff by saying things like “He started it,” the less seriously people will take your other, more thoughtful posts.&quot;

That doesn&#039;t sound correct to me.  The Ruling Party says things like that all the time where &quot;He&quot; is defined as President G.W. Bush with respect to levels of federal outlays, the amount of the public debt, the continued killings of the civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, the level of domestic unemployment, etc.  So I would think that &quot;tactic&quot; is honorable and noble by definition based upon that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The more you try to defend this stuff by saying things like “He started it,” the less seriously people will take your other, more thoughtful posts.&#8221;</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t sound correct to me.  The Ruling Party says things like that all the time where &#8220;He&#8221; is defined as President G.W. Bush with respect to levels of federal outlays, the amount of the public debt, the continued killings of the civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, the level of domestic unemployment, etc.  So I would think that &#8220;tactic&#8221; is honorable and noble by definition based upon that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Astolfi</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54138</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Astolfi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54138</guid>
		<description>Aloha,

I was the organizer for Gamaliel for this action – we were trying to get the attention of a large insurance comapny (UHC). I voted for Obama, and most us in Hawaii like him – but praying to him would be crazy, not to mention sacrilegious.  We never did it, and never would - the idea of it is silly at best.

Here’s the liturgy we used for the record:

With the prophet Jeremiah, we cry out, Is there no balm in Gilead? Is there no physician there? Why then has the health of my poor people not been restored?
Hear our cry, oh God!

With the prophet Martin﻿ Luther King Jr., we cry out, Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane.
Hear our cry, oh God!

From health care systems and industries that place profit over people,
Deliver us, oh God!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aloha,</p>
<p>I was the organizer for Gamaliel for this action – we were trying to get the attention of a large insurance comapny (UHC). I voted for Obama, and most us in Hawaii like him – but praying to him would be crazy, not to mention sacrilegious.  We never did it, and never would &#8211; the idea of it is silly at best.</p>
<p>Here’s the liturgy we used for the record:</p>
<p>With the prophet Jeremiah, we cry out, Is there no balm in Gilead? Is there no physician there? Why then has the health of my poor people not been restored?<br />
Hear our cry, oh God!</p>
<p>With the prophet Martin﻿ Luther King Jr., we cry out, Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane.<br />
Hear our cry, oh God!</p>
<p>From health care systems and industries that place profit over people,<br />
Deliver us, oh God!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Studebaker</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54137</link>
		<dc:creator>Studebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54137</guid>
		<description>Mollie didn&#039;t post a link to Breitbart, Grant.  She posted three links to Media Matters, which talks about Breitbart without, so far as I can tell, linking to Breitbart either.  I went to &quot;Breitbart.tv,&quot; but didn&#039;t see the actual story that folks are talking about.  So I&#039;m afraid that yes, I don&#039;t have the time to verify that whatever you guys are saying is accurate; I&#039;ll just take your word for it right now, and agree that Breitbart is a meanie.  

But I still don&#039;t like the left-wing smear machine (Media Matters, etc.) either.  Lying isn&#039;t cool, even if they&#039;re on your team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mollie didn&#8217;t post a link to Breitbart, Grant.  She posted three links to Media Matters, which talks about Breitbart without, so far as I can tell, linking to Breitbart either.  I went to &#8220;Breitbart.tv,&#8221; but didn&#8217;t see the actual story that folks are talking about.  So I&#8217;m afraid that yes, I don&#8217;t have the time to verify that whatever you guys are saying is accurate; I&#8217;ll just take your word for it right now, and agree that Breitbart is a meanie.  </p>
<p>But I still don&#8217;t like the left-wing smear machine (Media Matters, etc.) either.  Lying isn&#8217;t cool, even if they&#8217;re on your team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Gallicho</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54136</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Gallicho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54136</guid>
		<description>Stuart, you&#039;re too busy to read the link Mollie posted above, but you&#039;re not too busy to season so many dotCommonweal threads with your tired &quot;liberals are crazy too!&quot; mantra? I don&#039;t want to cross into Media Matters territory here, but color me unconvinced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart, you&#8217;re too busy to read the link Mollie posted above, but you&#8217;re not too busy to season so many dotCommonweal threads with your tired &#8220;liberals are crazy too!&#8221; mantra? I don&#8217;t want to cross into Media Matters territory here, but color me unconvinced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mollie Wilson O&#39;Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54135</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollie Wilson O&#39;Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54135</guid>
		<description>In that case, I&#039;m sorry we&#039;ve all forced you to work so hard to try to change the subject here, Stuart. Your time is obviously more valuable than we realize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that case, I&#8217;m sorry we&#8217;ve all forced you to work so hard to try to change the subject here, Stuart. Your time is obviously more valuable than we realize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Studebaker</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54133</link>
		<dc:creator>Studebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54133</guid>
		<description>Mark -- I&#039;ll happily say that whatever Breitbart&#039;s post said (and I don&#039;t remotely have the time to look at all of the many links above) was probably mean, and was certainly misinformed, and that bloggers who relied on the captions should have listened a bit more carefully.  I dislike the right-wing smear machine.  At the same time, I dislike the left-wing smear machine too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8212; I&#8217;ll happily say that whatever Breitbart&#8217;s post said (and I don&#8217;t remotely have the time to look at all of the many links above) was probably mean, and was certainly misinformed, and that bloggers who relied on the captions should have listened a bit more carefully.  I dislike the right-wing smear machine.  At the same time, I dislike the left-wing smear machine too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jameson</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54132</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jameson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54132</guid>
		<description>Oh for God&#039;s sake, Stuart and Sean. It&#039;s the tactic of a six-year-old to deflect guilt by pointing to another kid&#039;s transgressions. Can&#039;t you just condemn Breitbart&#039;s post as incredibly mean and incendiary and leave it at that? Maybe then the whole thing will just die out.

The more you try to defend this stuff by saying things like &quot;He started it,&quot; the less seriously people will take your other, more thoughtful posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh for God&#8217;s sake, Stuart and Sean. It&#8217;s the tactic of a six-year-old to deflect guilt by pointing to another kid&#8217;s transgressions. Can&#8217;t you just condemn Breitbart&#8217;s post as incredibly mean and incendiary and leave it at that? Maybe then the whole thing will just die out.</p>
<p>The more you try to defend this stuff by saying things like &#8220;He started it,&#8221; the less seriously people will take your other, more thoughtful posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Studebaker</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54131</link>
		<dc:creator>Studebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54131</guid>
		<description>So you don&#039;t think lying about what someone says, yes, even Glenn Beck, is wrong?  It&#039;s not as if Glenn Beck doesn&#039;t provide enough material to criticize without lying about him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you don&#8217;t think lying about what someone says, yes, even Glenn Beck, is wrong?  It&#8217;s not as if Glenn Beck doesn&#8217;t provide enough material to criticize without lying about him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mollie Wilson O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54130</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollie Wilson O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54130</guid>
		<description>Stuart, I knew I would get a few &quot;but what about if I change the subject to this other example of hypocrisy&quot; comments, but... if that thing you linked to really strikes you as an example of sharp media criticism, or as somehow embarrassing to Media Matters, I think you should probably just hold your fire. 

Meanwhile, everybody, if you&#039;re wondering who else was fooled and unable to admit it, check out, yes, Media Matters&#039;s &lt;a href=http://mediamatters.org/research/200909290055 rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;roundup&lt;/a&gt; of screenshots and transcripts from the various right-wingers who ran with this video yesterday. (Not that you should expect better from these folks.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart, I knew I would get a few &#8220;but what about if I change the subject to this other example of hypocrisy&#8221; comments, but&#8230; if that thing you linked to really strikes you as an example of sharp media criticism, or as somehow embarrassing to Media Matters, I think you should probably just hold your fire. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, everybody, if you&#8217;re wondering who else was fooled and unable to admit it, check out, yes, Media Matters&#8217;s <a href=http://mediamatters.org/research/200909290055 rel="nofollow">roundup</a> of screenshots and transcripts from the various right-wingers who ran with this video yesterday. (Not that you should expect better from these folks.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Studebaker</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54128</link>
		<dc:creator>Studebaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54128</guid>
		<description>Grant -- it just amuses me to see so many posts decrying right-wingers for being dishonest partisan hacks, but in the process citing a website (Media Matters) known for at least occasional dishonest partisan hackery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant &#8212; it just amuses me to see so many posts decrying right-wingers for being dishonest partisan hacks, but in the process citing a website (Media Matters) known for at least occasional dishonest partisan hackery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Gallicho</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54127</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Gallicho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54127</guid>
		<description>http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/rnc-raising-money-off-of-schoolchildren-singing-about-obama-comparing-it-to-stalin-and-kim-jong-il.php?ref=fpblg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/rnc-raising-money-off-of-schoolchildren-singing-about-obama-comparing-it-to-stalin-and-kim-jong-il.php?ref=fpblg" rel="nofollow">http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/rnc-raising-money-off-of-schoolchildren-singing-about-obama-comparing-it-to-stalin-and-kim-jong-il.php?ref=fpblg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Nickol</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54123</link>
		<dc:creator>David Nickol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54123</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I am not saying that there aren’t people engaging in outrageous hyperbole, but you have to be blind not to see that much of the president’s base of support is built on personality worship.&lt;/i&gt;

Sean,

Isn&#039;t &quot;personality worship&quot; outrageous hyperbole? Obama does have an appealing personality. We keep hearing from the pundits (interpreting polls) that Obama is more popular than his policies. That indicates to me that many people who disagree with his policies nevertheless like him. So why should it be wrong for people who do agree with his policies like him, too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I am not saying that there aren’t people engaging in outrageous hyperbole, but you have to be blind not to see that much of the president’s base of support is built on personality worship.</i></p>
<p>Sean,</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t &#8220;personality worship&#8221; outrageous hyperbole? Obama does have an appealing personality. We keep hearing from the pundits (interpreting polls) that Obama is more popular than his policies. That indicates to me that many people who disagree with his policies nevertheless like him. So why should it be wrong for people who do agree with his policies like him, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mollie Wilson O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717&#038;cpage=1#comment-54117</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollie Wilson O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=4717#comment-54117</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don’t remember seeing school children chant the praises of George Bush or Ronald Reagan.&lt;/i&gt;

Perhaps that&#039;s because their opposition wasn&#039;t filming patriotic shows in elementary schools and then sending the tape to Fox News -- or easily impressionable bloggers. (P.S. I first heard about &lt;a href=http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2006/04/17/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes/ rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; on The Daily Show -- this week.) &quot;The kind of thing that makes this believable&quot; is the desire to believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don’t remember seeing school children chant the praises of George Bush or Ronald Reagan.</i></p>
<p>Perhaps that&#8217;s because their opposition wasn&#8217;t filming patriotic shows in elementary schools and then sending the tape to Fox News &#8212; or easily impressionable bloggers. (P.S. I first heard about <a href=http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2006/04/17/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes/ rel="nofollow">this</a> on The Daily Show &#8212; this week.) &#8220;The kind of thing that makes this believable&#8221; is the desire to believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
