The small-government movement has created resistance to the reasonable proposals in the recent Vatican statement on financial reform. Yet, separate from the many strengths of the statement and the many problems in the way it’s been received in this country, there remains a significant hole in official Catholic social teaching on the economy.

Finding good resources for adult faith formation isn't easy. For years, the field has been wide open for someone who could combine actual substantive content with an engaging yet adult-worthy teaching style. Into this breach comes Catholicism.

The trouble with the new Roman Missal

The liturgical wars heat up

It's time for St. John XXIII

If George Weigel had lived in nineteenth-century France, he would have been termed an ultramontane—one who looked beyond the Alps to Rome. Instead, he looks from Washington to Rome.

Moral teaching after ‘Humanae Vitae’

Ratzinger, church law & the sexual-abuse crisis

Lisa Sowle Cahill’s middle way

Benedict & condoms

The pope on condoms

Way back in the twentieth century, when I decided to pursue doctoral work in theology, I never imagined that I would one day teach in an Oxford college. Neither did I imagine that John Henry Newman, of all people, would come to loom large in my day-to-day life.

The story of the first member of Focolare to be beatified

A short & unfinished history 

The legacy of Avery Dulles

Who is Canadian Cardinal Marc Ouellet?

In 1922, the Vatican issued norms for handling the canonical crime of the sexual abuse of minors by priests. The document was revised in 1962, and remained in force until 2001. Why did so few bishops know about it?

What does Rome know about pop music?

A pope who can and cannot change

A selection of articles from Commonweal on Benedict XVI.

A profile of the ethicist Gilbert Meilaender

No, this “Year of the Priest” has not been the best for priests or for any Catholics. Just when some of us thought we might be turning the corner, moving on, re-establishing some level of trust, it turns out the wounds are far deeper and much more widespread than we thought.

Stanley Hauerwas & the Christian Difference

The New York Times's worldview is secularist and secularizing, and as such it rivals the Catholic worldview. But what makes the Times unique is that it is not just the nation's self-appointed newspaper of record. It is, to paraphrase Chesterton, an institution with the soul of a church.

Where do Catholics look for hope?

Much of Pope Benedict's good work in addressing the sexual-abuse crisis is now likely to be brushed aside as the history of his own negligence in handling an abusive priest when he was archbishop of Munich thirty years ago comes to light.

The Holy See has changed the way the Catholic Church receives Anglicans into full communion. Does this signal a shift in the Catholic Church’s methodology for ecumenical engagement? As a consequence of the shift, will the church eventually alter the very goal of such engagement?

Beware those authorities who criticize the independent Catholic press on the ground that pluralism equals relativism. What they really favor is monopoly. They want a single joint blast on the trumpet, or an orchestra in full flow. What they do not like are the discordant notes.

If the priest is going to face east during Mass, so should everyone else.

Solidarity and subsidiarity in Benedict XVI’s ’Caritas in veritate’

  Why Rome’s turning inward does not serve the best interests of the church

The recently elected USCCB president on the pope's call to fight poverty

  Forty years after Vatican II, what would real collegiality look like?

Benedict’s insightful new encyclical, Spe salvi, is half lecture, half retreat conference.

  The Second Vatican Council according to Pope Benedict XVI

  Welcome back?

Another take on ’Jesus of Nazareth’

  Whatever happened to liturgical reform?

  What message will the Pope’s visit leave behind?

The lessons of Regensburg.

  What can we learn from the pope’s successful visit to Turkey?

A review of David Gibson’s ’The Rule of Benedict’

  What was the pope really saying in his controversial remarks at Regensburg?

  A former student of Joseph Ratzinger offers insights into the new pope.

Rumors of Benedict XVI’s scolding first encyclical have been greatly exaggerated. The Editors on Deus Caritas Est.

So far, Pope Benedict XVI has shown a surprising openness to interfaith dialogue. The Editors.

Bishops should not disagree with one another in public, especially on the most neuralgic issues of the day. For better and more often for worse, that discipline was a cornerstone of John Paul II’s pontificate. Yet disagree they did at the Synod of Bishops last month in Rome, the first of Benedict XVI’s papacy.

How is Benedict XVI, long a defender of orthodoxy and famous critic of the “dictatorship of relativism,” likely to approach interreligious dialogue? Does he see religious pluralism and tolerance as little more than an enticement to indifferentism or as something potentially more spiritually and intellectually fruitful?

  From the archives: Joseph Komonchak on Pope Benedict XVI’s theological vision.

The attitude of both John Paul II and Benedict XVI toward other religions has long been appreciated by non-Catholics. “But in the attitudes of both men toward internal Catholic matters there is something many Orthodox find a bit disturbing,” writes John Garvey, an Orthodox priest and Commonweal columnist.

  I have met Pope Benedict XVI only once. It was seventeen years ago, when I was a graduate student at Yale. Richard John Neuhaus had organized an invitation-only conference in New York on biblical interpretation. Among the invited guests were Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Raymond Brown, the widely respected biblical scholar, and the eminent Lutheran theologian George Lindbeck, my dissertation adviser, who had been a delegated observer at the Second Vatican Council. With the breezy temerity of youth, I wrote Neuhaus (then still Lutheran), and asked to be the “observer from the next generation” at the conference. Much to my amazement, he acceded to my request.

Charles E. Curran on the man who revoked his license to teach Catholic theology: "Ratzinger is a theological Augustinian who equates the heavenly city with the church and the earthly city with the world; hence the strong opposition between the church and the world in his thinking....I call myself a theological Thomist—one who accepts the basic goodness of humanity while recognizing that sin often tarnishes human endeavors."

  "No one knows exactly where Pope Benedict XVI will lead the church....one should be cautious in making assumptions about what sort of pope he will be by looking at his record at the CDF. The pastoral dimension of the papacy alone will demand a different set of talents and skills."

Reviews of The Ratzinger Report (1987)

In September 2004, Sidney Callahan assessed a Vatican document on the collaboration of men and women authored by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI.

In 1996, John Paul II issued the apostolic letter Universi dominici gregis, which laid down detailed procedures to govern the election of a new pope. Among the responsibilities of the cardinals, prior to the recent conclave, was to appoint two preachers “known for their sound doctrine, wisdom, and moral authority” who were to offer “meditations on the problems facing the church at the present time and on the need for careful discernment in choosing the new pope.” This requirement of prayerful discernment of spirits carries beyond the conclave and the election of the next pope and constitutes a continuing responsibility of the church gathered in the Spirit of Jesus Christ.

  In our five-part series on the challenges of the next papacy, Cathleen Kaveny recounts her first (and only) encounter with Cardinal Ratzinger: "He was a real academic, delighting in the world illumined by his beloved texts, which conveyed a reality that seemed to be more vivid to him than the reality conveyed by his own senses."

The Vatican’s recent document on feminism and “the collaboration of men and woman” explicitly rejects “an outdated conception of femininity”—a good starting point, says former Commonweal columnist and noted feminist author Sidney Callahan. Unfortunately, the Vatican letter also accuses feminists of trying to make themselves “the adversaries of men.”